排序方式: 共有58条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
51.
Leila Carmona Bonnie R. Lei Marta Pola Terrence M. Gosliner Ángel Valdés Juan Lucas Cervera 《Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society》2014,170(1):132-154
Spurilla neapolitana (Delle Chiaje, 1823) was considered to be a species with a broad geographic range and substantial colour variability; however, analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear gene data revealed that it is a complex of five distinct species. Further anatomical and morphological examinations determined that coloration is one of the main diagnostic traits for all five species, although some display substantial colour pattern variation. As a result of this study, S. neapolitana is determined to be restricted to the Mediterranean and eastern Atlantic. Spurilla sargassicola Bergh, 1871 from the Caribbean is redescribed and confirmed as a valid species. The name Spurilla braziliana MacFarland, 1909 is retained for western Atlantic and Pacific populations. Two new species are described herein. S purilla onubensis sp. nov. occurs in Europe, with a range overlapping that of S. neapolitana. Finally, S purilla dupontae sp. nov. is found in the Bahamas. © 2014 The Linnean Society of London 相似文献
52.
53.
Background
Inteins are self-splicing protein elements. They are translated as inserts within host proteins that excise themselves and ligate the flanking portions of the host protein (exteins) with a peptide bond. They are encoded as in-frame insertions within the genes for the host proteins. Inteins are found in all three domains of life and in viruses, but have a very sporadic distribution. Only a small number of intein coding sequences have been identified in eukaryotic nuclear genes, and all of these are from ascomycete or basidiomycete fungi. 相似文献54.
Eelke van der Horst Julio E Peironcely Adriaan P IJzerman Margot W Beukers Jonathan R Lane Herman WT van Vlijmen Michael TM Emmerich Yasushi Okuno Andreas Bender 《BMC bioinformatics》2010,11(1):316
Background
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a family of well-characterized drug targets with significant therapeutic value. Phylogenetic classifications may help to understand the characteristics of individual GPCRs and their subtypes. Previous phylogenetic classifications were all based on the sequences of receptors, adding only minor information about the ligand binding properties of the receptors. In this work, we compare a sequence-based classification of receptors to a ligand-based classification of the same group of receptors, and evaluate the potential to use sequence relatedness as a predictor for ligand interactions thus aiding the quest for ligands of orphan receptors. 相似文献55.
56.
57.
Samantha Cooke Dieta Hanson Yayoi Hirano Elysse Ornelas‐Gatdula Terrence M. Gosliner Alexey V. Chernyshev Ángel Valdés 《Zoologica scripta》2014,43(4):351-369
North Pacific specimens of Melanochlamys sea slugs were examined morphologically (including the male reproductive morphology, shell and external coloration) and were sequenced for three genes (mitochondrial COI and 16S and nuclear H3). Phylogenetic and species delimitation analyses were used to determine the evolutionary relationships and species diversity among the specimens examined. Both molecular and morphological data revealed an unexpected high level of cryptic diversity. At least four distinct species occur on the Northwestern Pacific. Melanochlamys ezoensis occurs in Russia and temperate and cold areas in Japan. Three additional undescribed species occur in Japan and/or South Korea. One of the undescribed species occurs both in South Korea and in Japan, but only in Tokyo Bay, suggesting that it could be non‐native in Japan. Two distinct species occur on the Northeastern Pacific coast; Melanochlamys diomedea is widespread from Southern California to Alaska, whereas M. ezoensis was found only in San Francisco Bay, suggesting a human‐mediated introduction. This is further supported by the absence of records of M. ezoensis in San Francisco prior to 2001. The species diversity of Melanochlamys in the Northwestern Pacific is much greater than in the Northeastern Pacific; it is hypothesized that differences in geographic and ocean current system complexity might account for different responses to glacial extinction and postglacial expansion. 相似文献
58.
Manuel António E Malaquias Jacqueline Mackenzie‐Dodds Philippe Bouchet Terrence Gosliner David G Reid 《Zoologica scripta》2009,38(1):23-41
The monophyly and phylogenetic relationships of the Cephalaspidea sensu lato ( sensu Burn and Thompson 1998 ) have been investigated by means of Bayesian, parsimony and distance analyses of nuclear (18S rRNA and 28S rRNA) and mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) genes.
Results revealed the presence of three monophyletic groups among the Cephalaspidea s. l. (i) Architectibranchia ( sensu Haszprunar 1985 , in part: including Acteonidae and Aplustridae, but excluding Diaphanidae), (ii) Cephalaspidea including Diaphanidae but not Runcinidae (both previously of uncertain systematic affinity), and (iii) Runcinacea.
The monophyly of the architectibranch families Acteonidae (represented by Acteon and Pupa ) and Aplustridae ( Hydatina and Micromelo ); of the runcinacean family Runcinidae ( Runcina ); and of the cephalaspidean families Aglajidae ( Chelidonura , Aglaja , Odontoglaja , Navanax and Philinopsis ), Bullidae ( Bulla ), Gastropteridae ( Siphopteron and Sagaminopteron ), Haminoeidae ( Atys , Haminoea , Phanerophthalmus and Smaragdinella, but not Ventomnestia ), and Retusidae ( Retusa and Pyrunculus , but not Volvulella ) is suggested. The families Scaphandridae ( Scaphander ) and Rhizoridae ( Volvulella ) are reinstated as valid. A new phylogenetic classification of the Cephalaspidea is proposed. 相似文献
Results revealed the presence of three monophyletic groups among the Cephalaspidea s. l. (i) Architectibranchia ( sensu Haszprunar 1985 , in part: including Acteonidae and Aplustridae, but excluding Diaphanidae), (ii) Cephalaspidea including Diaphanidae but not Runcinidae (both previously of uncertain systematic affinity), and (iii) Runcinacea.
The monophyly of the architectibranch families Acteonidae (represented by Acteon and Pupa ) and Aplustridae ( Hydatina and Micromelo ); of the runcinacean family Runcinidae ( Runcina ); and of the cephalaspidean families Aglajidae ( Chelidonura , Aglaja , Odontoglaja , Navanax and Philinopsis ), Bullidae ( Bulla ), Gastropteridae ( Siphopteron and Sagaminopteron ), Haminoeidae ( Atys , Haminoea , Phanerophthalmus and Smaragdinella, but not Ventomnestia ), and Retusidae ( Retusa and Pyrunculus , but not Volvulella ) is suggested. The families Scaphandridae ( Scaphander ) and Rhizoridae ( Volvulella ) are reinstated as valid. A new phylogenetic classification of the Cephalaspidea is proposed. 相似文献